In 1977, Wisconsin won two overtime games at the Olympia Stadium to become the "other" NCAA champion in Wisconsin. The hockey finals were Friday-Saturday, early in March. The basketball final, won by the Marquette Warriors, was the Monday immediately after.
What's up with the smaller universities borrowing professional uniforms? The North Dakota Fighting Sioux look like the Chicago Blackhawks at a St. Patrick's Day party, and the St. Cloud Huskies put a small St. inside a Montreal-style C.
A cultural conservative is a liberal with a teenage daughter. Sometimes the education begins earlier.
The Boy complained again this week -- it's becoming pretty regular -- that he's bored with math, because it's too easy. Worse, he's frustrated with his classmates, since they keep needing to review stuff that he mastered two years ago. He's in third grade.
Peer pressure is starting to kick in, too. A few days ago he got a problem wrong in class, and several of the other students did that "oooo" sound they do. He was embarrassed, and angry, and a little upset at the teacher for not doing anything about it.
Use the Force, young apprentice.
As an educator, though, it brought home to me again my conflicted attitude toward 'tracking.' I know the arguments against it, and concede a great deal of truth to some of them. Yes, it tends to recreate socioeconomic class lines. Yes, it can lead to a sense of entitlement in the 'honors' group, and a sense of futility on the other end.
But at the same time, I see a bright and curious child basically forced to circle the airport over and over again waiting for others to eventually get out of his way, and I don't see the point. He's bright and curious now; if he's frustrated for too long, he'll turn his attentions elsewhere. It's well and good to talk about diversity, but he's getting mad at his classmates for holding him back, and they're getting mad at him for outshining them. It seems like respect for diversity should include diversity of talent, and should involve letting different levels of talent express themselves.
If he had outstanding athletic talent, he could express it freely and win approval for it. If he had outstanding artistic talent, the same would hold. But as a really bright kid whose wheels keep turning, he's considered suspect. It's a waste, and it's causing him real pain.
Kick me out of the Liberal Academic Club for saying so, but I can't wait for tracking to start. The kid is bored to tears -- literally -- and I just don't see what purpose is served. He's bright enough to notice how other kids react to him, but still young enough that he can't just tune it out. At that age, school is huge. It's his world. Being ostracized and bored on a daily basis seems like punishment, but he hasn't done anything wrong. He's a great kid with a lively mind and a true appetite for learning; I don't want that beaten out of him. I understand that other kids haven't had some of the advantages he has, but punishing him won't solve that. It's not his fault.
He's naming names, not necessarily the usual suspects. California, Maryland, Washington: solid academic reputations all.
I fail to see why a small number of programs that seem largely indifferent to the academic success of their student-athletes continue to be rewarded with opportunities for postseason glory. I played with inner-city players who had been used and dumped by their universities. When the ball stopped bouncing, they struggled to find work, had difficult lives, and some died early. The dividing line for success was between those who went to college and got their degrees and those who did not.
In this year's NCAA tournament, 12 men's teams -- or about one out of five in the field that started play last week -- have failed to graduate 40 percent of their players, based on the NCAA's expansive graduation rate formula. The NCAA formula allows players six years to graduate -- and it does not count transfers or players who leave early to go to the pros against a team's graduation record, as long as the players leave in good academic standing.
And one of her correspondents discovers an inequity in the basketball tournament.
It's time for everyone at universities -- professors, administrators, students -- to ask: "What am I doing to entertain the nation? Am I earning the tax dollars that go to support my institution?"
I can't speak for administrators and students, but an obvious starting point for professors would be a national road show or whistle-stop tour elaborating on the "Nutty Professor/Irwin Corey/Dr. Frankenstein" persona, with the cast -- drawn from a wide array of American universities -- playing hilarious variations on bumbling psychotics.
It gets better. Go. Enjoy.
Cornell's run to the Sweet 16 as a No. 12 seed may be tarnished after reports surfaced today that all 13 players on the roster have been given elite educations that all but guarantee high-paying jobs after they leave the school.
"It's important to remember that right now these are only allegations -- allegations that we are looking into," said NCAA president James Isch. "But, obviously, if true, this would be very disappointing. The NCAA has certain expectations and standards. It's not fair for players at one school to be given expensive educations while athletes at other member schools receive basic, remedial instruction that is worth essentially nothing."
For my part, I want to know who gave the chart that shows fouls, times-out remaining, and posession arrow the idiotic name of game reset? Wouldn't the point of resetting the game be to restore all the times-out, pardon all the fouls, and have a new center jump?
Yes, dear reader, when you hear somebody going on about crumbling infrastructure, it's somebody who is not railroad aware.
Buffett chuckles at the suggestion that buying the nation's second-biggest railroad is a sign of senility. He argues that railroads represent the future. They're best-positioned to haul the raw material and finished goods for a nation and economy that he insists are bound to grow. Unlike trucks, trains don't have to compete on congested highways. Nor do railroads depend on strapped governments to maintain infrastructure.
"They don't need the government to build them new highways and airports," he says in an interview with USA TODAY. "They've already invested heavily in their infrastructure and technology, and they plan to invest more to keep up with the growing demand.
"They're the only mode of freight transportation that can handle growth. What's not to like about that?"
This infrastructure is not necessarily the kind of trackage the advocates of those fast passenger trains want. On the other hand, there are gains from trade between the passenger operators and the freight railroads in improving the rights of way, particularly at junctions.
And the railroads are ready. The [Association of American Railroads] member railroads have poured more than $440 billion, better than 40% of their combined revenues, between deregulation in 1980 and 2008 into new locomotives and technologies to improve hauling capabilities and lower costs. They've laid double, triple, quadruple tracks in heavily traveled rail corridors to relieve costly shipping bottlenecks. They've opened new and enlarged existing rail yards and intermodal shipping sites, where ocean shipping containers and de-coupled highway truck trailers can be stacked on flat cars for long-haul shipping, to make lines more accessible.
Meanwhile, inflation-adjusted average shipping rates, excluding fuel and other surcharges, fell 49% over that same 28-year period, according to AAR data. And the same economics of scale that help make rails the lowest-cost option for transporting heavy loads long distances also happen to make them relatively "green" in an era when that increasingly matters.
The NIU athletic department incurred a loss of $271,152 from the football team’s participation in the International Bowl. This deficit will be covered by the internal athletic department fund. One way this fund has been developed is by playing “guaranteed games” against opponents like Wisconsin, Tennessee and Minnesota.The guarantee, a payment from a program with a bigger stadium and stronger attendance, is not necessarily a bought win for those teams any more.
Indeed. I'll leave to others the nuances of Black Respectability as distinct somehow from bourgeois norms.
One, while I am not so naive as to believe that all things being equal that race is not operative here--I must suggest that a white (or even Asian) student acting in the same fashion would be treated more benignly (but in this age of school violence I am unsure). Nevertheless, Robyn Foster [the angry student] is no Henry Louis Gates Jr. (who is a legitimate victim of police harassment)--as much as the racism chasers will christen her as heir to his throne. While some "celebrity" will inevitably come to her--and perhaps this is what she yearned for subconsciously--Foster is not, nor should be, a Cause celebre. Two, what do we do with a college educational system, that at the highest levels, is being pressured to admit an excessive number of students (many of whom may not be equipped for success socially, inter-personally, or intellectually) for purposes of enrollment and to fatten the fiscal bottom line? Who is being served? Who is being cheated?
To point: in this incident I see a culture clash that is centered upon deference and comportment in the face of authority (quite literally, I suspect this student does not know how to deal with criticism. To boot, the idea of either public censuring and/or correction is too much for her to manage given her understandings of what "respect" and local norms of "prestige" and "power" are).
To my eyes, this video screams a lack of maturity and not race as the overriding issue of dispute and controversy. Some may say that this reading is my impressing of a bourgeois norm of respectability--and Black Respectability--onto a student who may be born of neither milieu. I disagree. Good comportment is good comportment--however awkward my phrasing may be--in the classroom and elsewhere, and the lessons of higher education should and ought to be how to best transcend one's origins and circumstances.
Mr Holmes got Inspector Lestrade into the plotters' inner circle. There's always a mole in the government agency (I have some suspects already) that Mr Bauer has to help identify.The game is now afoot! The cousin is obviously free-lance FBI consultant Renee Walker.
One of the terrorists looks through the scope at Jack. He’s just about to put a bullet into Jack’s head, when Renee decides to do the same thing to the terrorist instead. She takes one step out, fires her gun, and kills the last terrorist. They needed her from the beginning!Chloe gets word to Renee who somehow gets across the East River (the authorities only stopping traffic into Manhattan) and finds the shootout between what's left of Jack Bauer's team and two bad guys.
Jack: How did you find us?
Renee: I listened for the sound of the guns. Elementary.
That's after she has already gotten someone into the plotters' inner circle (there's a riff about getting inside that I'd really rather not make ...)
As far as the mole, I had reason to suspect
Dana makes a phone call to….SAMIR! They discuss the entire new subplot in which Dana has been working for the terrorists the entire time! She’s going to use CTU resources to help them, which is definitely against CTU protocol.One commenter had Natasha speaking to Samir with a Russian accent?! Hmmm, did Renee find an Arkansas probation officer to serve in the Inspector Lestrade role?
We'll have to wait two weeks for the real fun. The preview for next week has the bad guys attempting to extort something from Madame President, but the final game of the men's basketball tournament tips off in medias XXIV the week after.
Barring an extraordinary economic boom, the American situation will soon require the slow and painful restructuring of the welfare state that liberals have spent decades building. This environment may or may not lead to a revival of D.L.C.-style centrism among the Democrats, but at the very least it’s hard to see it proving congenial to further adventures in sweeping social legislation.Worst case scenario: Russian post-Communist hyperinflation. But perhaps there's a method.
I’ve talked to liberals who seem to understand this: The reckoning is coming, they allow, and the theory of health care reform has always been to get everybody inside the barrel before it goes over the falls. (I’d lay good money that this is Peter Orszag’s view of the matter.) But seen in this light, the health care victory looks less like the dawn of a bold new era, and more like the final lurch forward before a slow retreat.The nature of that retreat, however, is yet to be seen.
There's accumulating evidence that the universities are losing money on the positional arms races called men's basketball and football, and the way to make the women's tournament something other than Stanford and Tennessee and Connecticut is to ... get into another positional arms race?
"Until more women's coaches are held accountable for wins and losses and style of play, there is nothing we can do about it. It's proven that the more programs that do that, the more people will come out and watch," Auriemma said. "Every men's program in men's basketball is trying to make the tournament. That's not the case with women's basketball. Until that happens, the sport will be in a little bit of a holding pattern.
Auriemma said the top players coming out of high school are going to a wider range of schools.
"The programs who might rank from five to 45 in the game are much more competitive than they once were. So the game is slowly getting there," Auriemma said.
Auriemma said any perceived stagnation of the game's growth is the fault of university presidents and athletic directors who do not respect women's basketball enough for it to succeed.
"What has to happen is that enough athletic directors and university presidents need to make more of a commitment to the women's game so they will put more pressure on their coaches to coach better. They don't put enough money into the programs to demand from their coaches that they play at that level."
All they are doing is fulfilling their obligation by having a women's program and making sure the kids graduate. They tell [the women coaches] they have enough trouble dealing with men's basketball and football, so don't bother me. So [administrators] would rather status quo remained. That would be unacceptable on the men's side, but they let it happen on the women's side."
Um, Coach Auriemma, is the University of Connecticut attempting to be competitive with Northern Illinois in accounting or Michigan State in engineering or Wisconsin in chemistry or Penn State in economics? I leave the generalization of your argument to the reader as an exercise.
(Via Women's Hoops.)
The Indian military has a new weapon against terrorism: the world's hottest chili. After conducting tests, the military has decided to use the thumb-sized "bhut jolokia," or "ghost chili," to make tear gas-like hand grenades to immobilize suspects, defense officials said Tuesday.With a national security question.
The bhut jolokia was accepted by Guinness World Records in 2007 as the world's spiciest chili.
5. Will India ban exports of this pepper due to national security?Too late:
I have plans to make my already deadly chili even deadlier. My source of jolokia seeds, as well as Charleston Hots (which are effective against nematodes, although I'm not sure that's a problem here) is a South Carolina
Amtrak's current routing is Milwaukee - Portage - La Crosse - Winona - St. Paul.
The Wisconsin Talgo can pick up the current routing (which was once home to the world's fastest passenger trains) at Portage, or with some trackwork north of Baraboo, at Camp Douglas. Representatives from Eau Claire made their case for continuing the service through their city and into Minnesota at Hudson. There is a lot of congestion on Interstate 94, but that routing misses several Minnesota population centers. Rochester also wants in on the train, although that would be going the long way around. (The article claims Rochester never had direct train service to the Twin Cities. Strictly speaking that is not true, although a Chicago Great Western Rochester - Randolph doodlebug connecting with a Hayfield - Minneapolis doodlebug isn't exactly Hiawatha service.)
The value of a passenger train network is in its connectivity, and the old Chicago and North Western service to the area had it almost right, with trains connecting at Wyeville. Unfortunately, there is probably not yet sufficient traffic to run limited-stop trains via Eau Claire and Madison, exchanging passengers at Camp Douglas with expresses via Winona, La Crosse, Portage, and directly to Milwaukee. And if I propose to supplement the expresses with semi-fasts from Madison calling at Watertown, Oconomowoc, Brookfield and the existing Hiawatha stops (plus Gurnee) and other semi-fasts from Madison calling at Stoughton, Janesville, Beloit, Harvard, and Barrington you'll ask if I've had some kind of mushroom.
University Diaries lays out the case against them at length.
Angus at Kids Prefer Cheese puts it plainly.
That's not to say entitlements can't be undone.
Bolsheviks only stormed through that arch in the movies. But behind the walls is an instructive lesson. No, not the Hermitage art galleries, in which the Tsar's collection of impressionist works was Khrushchev's degenerate art. Not the stonework in those galleries, which might be artistically more significant than the paintings. Rather, it's the elderly ladies serving as security in each gallery. At the time of my visit, Russia was in depression, with one third of the Yaroslavl working class officially listed as unemployed, accompanied by a hyperinflation in which a half-liter bottle of Pepsi went for several thousand rubles. Metal kopecks, let alone one- or five-ruble notes, didn't exist. Those ladies were receiving a paycheck to supplement defined-benefit pensions of a few hundred rubles a month.
With Social Security administrators selling the Treasury bills it holds as trust fund assets into a weakening market for Treasuries and Walgreens declining further Medicare patients, the issue is not necessarily one of repeal.
Wisconsin has a $47.6 million deal with Talgo to build two 14-car trains for Amtrak's Milwaukee-to-Chicago Hiawatha line, with an option to buy two more for a planned extension of that route from Milwaukee to Madison. The federal government has awarded the state $810 million in stimulus money for the Milwaukee-to-Madison route, which will start service at 79 mph in 2013 and reach 110 mph by 2015, plus another $12 million for upgrades on the Milwaukee-to-Chicago route.The decision by Wisconsin to buy Talgo trains involves opportunity costs. Milwaukee commuter car assembly company Super Steel has filed for receivership, an outcome possibly unrelated to the choice of Talgo. State commuter rail authorities haven't been placing many orders recently. Super Steel might provide components for the Talgo trains. The Wisconsin award to Talgo, under a no-bid contract provision, has become an issue in the Wisconsin gubernatorial election.
But the picture changed when the Oregon Department of Transportation announced [February 26] that it would be buying two 13-car trains made at the new factory "with a majority of American-made components" for Amtrak's Cascades line, which runs from Eugene, Ore., to Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
If more states start buying Talgo trains, the number of jobs at the new plant would rise sharply, said Bauman, who once ran a company that produced rail cars.
That mention of other states considering Talgo trains intrigues. A low center of gravity train (articulated like a Prior and Church roller coaster train) isn't reqired for fast running on the Wisconsin service. From LaCrosse to St. Paul, yes. Along Puget Sound, which is curvy trackage, yes. But then there's the historic stomping grounds of Patrick McGinnis's early-version Talgos (noisy, rough-riding, uncomfortable.) The Acela Expresses are approaching their half-life, and an extended Boston to Brunswick, Maine service offers ample opportunities for a comfortable, flexible train to strut its stuff.
Apparently, despite the retort producing byproduct coke and coal chemicals as well as the coal gas stored in the now-demolished telescoping gasholders, the building is not toxic.
Like other former industrial buildings from the early 20th century, its features include brick construction, high ceilings and dozens of large windows.
But unlike many of those buildings, this one isn't marked by support columns, which tie up usable space. Instead, the building's roof is supported by steel arches that rise 50 feet above the floor. Those arches made room for a huge industrial oven where coal was baked to produce gas for streetlights, factories and homes until being replaced by electricity and cheaper natural gas. The building, constructed in 1902 and 1903, had its gas-making oven shut down in the 1950s, and most of the gas company complex is now used for storage.
But with Cornell excusing the men and Vermont excusing the women, the last major sport dancing is hockey, opening at Minneapolis against Vermont, and Cornell in the road to the title.
It's entertaining, particularly when the performers self-refute their own claims.
I note, however, that a full rebuttal of the claims of self-styled progressives requires stronger stuff than specialization and competitive markets alone can provide.
President Obama filled out his final four brackets for the men's NCAA tournament. He told ESPN he was choosing Kansas, Kansas State, Kentucky and Villanova to make the final four.Score another one for the mid-majors, with Northern Iowa (UNI, not to be confused with NIU) ousting Kansas and candidate America's Team St. Mary's (I may have to watch them -- do any of their players genuflect before shooting a free throw?) excusing Villanova.
Has anybody noticed how many Big East teams are out? How is that hopey-changey stuff working?
I can’t be in a relationship with a woman who is only into makeup, diets, and marriage. I’m sure there are men out there who can be, much the way I know there are women who only want dudes who are into banking, saunas, and not working.We'll contemplate the hypothesized supply curve of trophy wives in a future post.
No institution can ever be completely prepared for such a horrible event, but hopefully by sharing our experience others may better prepare and respond to the needs of their campus communities during times of tragedy.The report is a 322-page .pdf file with numerous appendices. It will take me some time to read and understand it.
As difficult as it is to re-live the events of that day, it also serves as a reminder of how grateful we are as a university community. In our time of greatest need, thousands of people from all over the world would reach out to help us. From the local law enforcement officers and emergency medical technicians who were on the scene within minutes providing invaluable assistance; to the hundreds of counselors from across the Midwest who dropped everything and answered our call for help; to members of our DeKalb County community who welcomed our students back with cookies and hugs – all provided aid, support and comfort during a very difficult time. Their actions have much to teach about the value of preparedness, cooperation, neighborliness, and humanity.As I noted at the time, the goodwill will help us.
South Africa has spent at least $6 billion in preparations for this summer's World Cup. How can a poor but developing country like South Africa afford to host such an extravagant party? Simply put, it can't.We leave the generalization to aspiring mid-majors and other institutions of higher
Under the proposal, the Department of Health potentially becomes a monopsonist. (The skeptics tend to take that position, the proponents aren't persuaded.) A monopsony can improve resource allocation in a bilateral monopoly situation, although the applicability of that model to medicine is limited by the ability of physicians to opt out.
And note the way in which school choice with government schools works. You do have school choice, provided you're willing to pay the premium for the house in the better school district. And the right preschool?And when Megan McArdle took it up, I was able to go one better. Here's the McArdle version.
Actually, this makes me think that a lot of the opposition to vouchers is about that affluent suburbanite's need to maintain the delusion that they care about inner city public schools. Memo to suburban voucher opponents who "support public education": you're already sending your kid to private school. You're just confused because your tuition fees came bundled with granite countertops and hardwood floors.And my extension:
That reminds me of McCormick, Shughart, and Tollison's 1984 "The Disinterest in Deregulation," wherein the rents are concentrated and the welfare gains small and costly to collect. And yes, genuine competition among school districts is likely to bring in its train some capital losses to current homeowners whose mortgages include that test-score premium in the house price.Now, via The Bellows, comes a conversation that touches on all these points.
Kevin Drum highlights a really regrettable defense of public schools that goes as follows. School systems are neighborhood-based, and so the benefit of good schools is capitalized into home prices. Households that care about education are willing to pay for good schools while those that don’t, aren’t. Freedom! Or something.It's not that simple. Prices ration access to scarce resources. It's quite possible that the price of a bundle consisting of that McMansion and a good school district is high so as to encourage self-selection. (It might have been Walter Bagehot who made a similar observation about first- and third-class train fares in England, although in that case he claimed the railroads, er, railways, degraded the third-class service so as to discourage the richer passengers from riding on the cheap.) There's analysis along those lines in The Bellows.
The conversation about education policy appears to have begun here.
That is, parents have the right to settle in whatever school district they choose. (They also have a constitutional right to send their children to private school if they wish.) Predictably, therefore, those families willing to pay the most for a good education gravitate to the best schools, the “price” of which is reflected in the cost of real estate and local property taxes, while the families that care the least about education gravitate to the worst. Meanwhile, the extent to which parents value education itself enhances (or degrades) school quality, as schools are always more likely to thrive when they can attract the families with the highest social capital. Thus, good schools and “good” (that is, education-valuing) families cluster together. So long as Americans enjoy freedom of movement, supply and demand will always tend to produce a huge gap between successful and failing schools. The outcome is basically fair and not altogether inefficient.It's not clear that there has to be a huge gap between successful and failing schools. There's nothing inherent in Tieboutian competition among jurisdictions that requires a wide range of outcomes. (An educational establishment that aggravates tension between education-valuing families and families with other objectives by mainstreaming slow learners and troublemakers, or by enabling disruptive behavior as a cultural difference, will produce more pressures to outmigrate.)
School vouchers, for example, a favorite policy of “accountability” proponents, punish those very school systems that have already worked very hard, thank you very much, to attract the best students and most civic-minded parents. (It’s no surprise that vouchers have proven to be politically unpopular, including if not especially among Republican voters.) Similarly, shutting down failing schools and redistributing their students punishes those schools that have performed marginally better and thereby attracted marginally better students and parents. The “accountability” movement, in short, wants to equalize the quality of educational products, no matter the price paid for them. Whatever this merits of this policy, it surely does not show much faith in the free market.And here, the author conflates two effects. Vouchers have the potential to inflict capital losses on homeowners who are currently buying a Tieboutian bundle including good schools, with those higher College Board scores capitalized into the house prices. They also have the potential to encourage favorable self-selection. At the margin, vouchers and transfers need not transform the equivalent of a Milwaukee Hamilton of the early 1970s into the dropout factory that it is today, basketball success or not.
This essay gets to the heart of the matter.
If we really want better schools in the areas that have the poorest results, we’ll have to fix communities first. And communities will need to do that from the ground up, not Washington down. That’s no simply task, but it is at least more realistic than thinking we can fix schools through federal legislation or by issuing standardized tests or pushing all students toward higher education or by sucking money from the public schools and redistributing it into private ones.To do so would require the colleges of education to lose their fascination with Rousseau and understand their objective as preparing teachers to develop the habits of the middle class in youngsters. Oppressive as that sounds, it is less oppressive than allowing youngsters to believe that anything goes.
It appears as though Kevin Drum at Mother Jones is catching on.
Or, on a more serious note, we could fund poverty and educational interventions with proven track records, allow schools more leeway to deal with incorrigible students, encourage our best teachers to work in our most challenging schools and allow principals to fire the ones who fail, promote experimentation via charter schools, and make sure every school is adequately funded. Feel free to add your own favorite ideas to this list. It's a little messy and it's no silver bullet — it's a long, hard slog, if you will — but these are the sorts of things that will eventually make a difference. Best of all, some of it is even politically feasible.It's more important that the right things be done than that I get credit for it.
The student is indeed an adult, but unless she's financially autonomous, her tuition is paid by some combination of the university, her parents, and the American taxpayer. She's wasting a good deal more than her own chance at an education -- she's thumbing her nose at the generosity of well-meaning people. And her behavior harms more than her financial sponsors. Her indifference to the professor and her fellow students, and the public nature of her screen images, add up to something distracting, demoralizing, and angering for other people.The Prussian in me leads me to endorse laptop bans. The Pigouvian (as one would expect of an economist with a Wisconsin Ph.D.) wonders if there isn't an optimal tax on laptop use.
I doubt many of us think much these days of the great discovery of the refrigerated railroad car. We have the Germans to thank, who wanted refrigeration for their beer. (We have beer to thank! We must always thank beer!)The Superintendent endorses the sentiments, although in the interest of historical accuracy, refers readers to John H. White's The American Railroad Freight Car for the history of the refrigerated box car, and for the privately operated meat reefers: the railroads being reluctant to invest in special-purpose cars that would be operated empty at least half the time. If you'd like some early twentieth century corporate special pleading with your Sprecher, there's a new reprint of Jonathan Ogden Armour's The Packers, The Private Car Lines, and the People (think of it as the anti-Jungle) available.
The brewers, prior to Prohibition, probably had more colorful billboard refrigerator cars than the meat packers.
The first time, in 1972, the team surprised most of the pundits. The 1990 trip was tainted by a legal challenge. Here's how the Racine press reported the game.
Be afraid of the Milwaukee Hamilton boys basketball team. Be very afraid.
And not just in 2010, but in 2011, too.
On Saturday night, the Wildcats laid the foundation for becoming a monster team by routing Racine Park, 88-66, in the WIAA Division 1 sectional final at Greenfield. Hamilton (20-3) advances to the state tournament for the first time since 1992, and only the fourth time in school history.
Hamilton coach Tom Diener started five juniors and watched them dismantle the speedy, athletic Panthers in the first half. In a red-hot second quarter, the Wildcats outscored Park, 26-14, took an 18-point halftime lead and then coasted to victory before a packed Greenfield gymnasium. The crowd never got the tight, hotly contested game they expected between two of the state's top teams.
When Hamilton won that 1972 title, there were two state tournaments, one for the government schools and one for the independent schools. The two athletic associations have since merged. Hamilton's first opponent in Madison will be Milwaukee Marquette, the old Marquette University High School (where promising basketballers used to get tuition waivers.) Milwaukee King and Milwaukee Washington have both been excused. And, recalling that 1972 tournament, first-round opponent Antigo and final game opponent Neenah are again in the field.
The free-wheeling swagger that so typified the disposition of the Park High School boys basketball team during this unforgettable season slowly eroded. In its place were expressions of concern and, ultimately, somberness.
The Panthers finally met their match Saturday night, losing to Milwaukee Hamilton 88-66 in a WIAA Division 1 sectional championship at Greenfield. For the sixth time since they made their last state tournament appearance in 1960, the Panthers advanced this far, only to fall just short.
And while Park (15-11) forfeited 10 victories in late February because of truancies, this was the first time this season it actually came up on the short end on the scoreboard.
The comments to the article include a call for 2π Day on 6/28, and Casual π Day (otherwise known as Indiana Legislature π Day) on 22 July.
A Norfolk and Western modern compound Y6, with auxiliary water tender, scratchbuilt in nickel silver. I've been told that the modeller makes his own machine screws. My 4-14-4 is crude by comparison, but I've not been working at these as long, and I'm not ashamed to use commercial machine screws.
This Milwaukee Road late-pattern H16-44 started as a Lionel Train Master body shell. There are a few of these shells in my pile of projects. It's encouraging to see how well they can turn out.
A Milwaukee Electric interurban, rebuilt with steel sheathing at the original Cold Spring Shops from a wood deck-roof car. This car was assigned to special runs as its field taps would cut in a little faster.
The Fox Valley O Scalers had an open day after the show.
A USRA Heavy Mike with the long-distance tender will fit the Spechts Ferry turntable, if it's positioned properly.
A number of aspects of train reliability should be considered. These range from establishing why the snow filters proved inadequate and what caused electronic failures on board, through to examining what lessons can be learnt from train operators in other countries who run trains in extreme cold weather, as well as in warm, underground conditions.Apparently The Pennsylvania Railroad was not previously worthy of study.
But there are older lessons to relearn.
The failure of the air conditioning caused serious discomfort and distress to passengers and the Review has recommended that this issue be addressed as a priority. This should be done by reviewing how the pantograph can be raised safely and independently.Under some circumstances, when a train fails, a circuit automatically lowers the pantograph, and that's the end of power for the air conditioners and the galleys and possibly the toilets. And if the pantograph is raised by compressed air and the air has bled off ...
There was a railroad running electric trains through the mountains in winter as early as 1915. Look closely at pictures of their locomotives, and you will see a small trolley pole. It's fused, so you can't draw enough power through it to run the train. But it does allow enough current to flow so that you can start the air compressor, and raise the main pantograph, and boot up the locomotive. It's spring-loaded, and you control it with a rope.
The recommendations for informing passengers are also instructive.
Where the service is suspended, we recommend Eurostar should provide information on alternative means of transport for passengers, as well as providing its own limited coach service for passengers where necessary and providing links to other transport operators from its websiteThe Rules Examiner asks the Superintendent to remind readers of Rule 870 (Train employes must give attention to the comfort of passengers ...) and Rule 890 (Train employes must familiarize themselves with the instructions governing heating, lighting, ventilation and airconditioning ...). An older Rules includes in its General Notice "The good will and friendship of the communities served by this railroad are its most valuable assets; and the strongest recommendation for promotion an employe can possibly have is the fact that by uniform corutesy and kindly accommodation of patrons he has secured for himself and for the railroad the good will and friendship of the community he serves."
Some versions of the Rules include provisions for notifying passengers when the service becomes disarranged.
In the matter of Schlitz, there's a Cold Spring Shops connection, and a restoration of the old formula but only after much trouble.
The once-heady brew of American freedom has become watery and
In fact, when I think of the federal government's brand now, I think of Schlitz beer. Schlitz was once a top national brew. But, in search of short-term gains, it began gradually reducing its quality in tiny increments to save money, substituting cheaper malt, fewer hops and "accelerated" brewing for its traditional approach.
Each incremental decline was imperceptible to consumers, but after a few years, people suddenly noticed that the beer was no good anymore. Sales collapsed, and a "Taste My Schlitz" campaign designed to lure beer drinkers back failed when the "improved" brew turned out not to be any better. A brand image that had been accumulated over decades was lost in a few years, and it has never recovered.
The federal government, alas, finds itself in much the same position. The political class sold its legitimacy off in drips and drabs. As "smart politics" has come over the past decades to mean not persuasion but the practice of legerdemain, the use of political deals, cover from a friendly press apparat and taking advantage of voters' rational ignorance, the governing classes have managed to achieve things that would surely have failed had the people known what was going on.
But though each little trick may have slipped by the voters, the voters have nonetheless noticed that the ultimate product isn't what it used to be. The end result, as with Schlitz, is a tarnished brand.
In the matter of public policy, the road to restoration is more challenging. Disabusing the electorate of the notion that government exists to Solve Problems is difficult. Instilling in aspirants to state and national office a proper modesty about being able to Solve Problems is orders of magnitude more difficult.
More on that last point to come.
What's missing from this singularly instructive article is any hint that the air carriers will add more capacity, whether as additional planes or additional gates, or additional runways.
Airlines are pushing back against new rules that give fliers more rights.
They are threatening to cancel scores of flights in response to a new rule that would prohibit airlines from keeping passengers on the tarmac for more than three hours without giving travelers the opportunity to get off the plane. As of April 29, carriers that break the rule would face steep fines of up to $27,500 per passenger, or more than $4 million on a full Boeing 737 or Airbus A320.
Carriers say that to avoid those fines, they will aggressively cancel flights before and during storms—even if the bad weather never materializes. The threats could foreshadow significant changes in air travel, making it even less reliable for millions of road warriors and vacationers. By canceling flights, it could take days for all travelers to get home when storms strike.
The benefit-cost calculations for cross-country fast trains, and the Midwestern passenger rail network, look better all the time. Three hours should be Chicago to Springfield (why fly?) or Wisconsin Dells (you can't fly there) or Iowa City or Oshkosh (hee!)
The three-hour limit doesn't mean flights must be canceled at three hours or face fines, just that airlines and airports have to find a way to get people off of an airplane if they want off. That can mean returning to a gate to unload passengers or rolling up a staircase and busing passengers back to terminals. Pilots have to agree that it's safe to unload people and air-traffic controllers have to agree that it wouldn't be disruptive to operations—both major caveats likely to limit disruption from the new rule.
Getting people off flights can be a major disruption for airlines and airports. One major penalty: Air-traffic controllers take flights first-come, first-serve, forcing them into long lines and punishing them for leaving the line and returning to a terminal. And sometimes when flights return to a gate pilots become ineligible under federal duty rules to continue that trip.
Procedures like returning to gates or using portable stairs and buses are uncommon in the U.S. (Remote parking and busing passengers is far more common in Europe.) But airports and airlines are working on new procedures and options for flights that face long delays, including more buses, stairs and reserving gates for quickly unloading customers.
On the other hand, offering a premium service (no special education students to drag everybody down) is an opportunity to charge premium prices. But I digress. Perhaps, as the column suggests, there are more cost-effective ways to identify those late bloomers.
For example, 25 percent of all tuition increases [in the North Carolina system] will be dedicated to expanding special programs to increase retention and graduation rates, primarily for students with weak academic backgrounds.
The focus on such special programs gives out mixed signals about how to deal with the problem of low graduation rates. For, at the same time plans are being formulated to expand these programs for students who are unprepared to begin college, university officials are also considering addressing the same problem by an opposing tactic—limiting enrollment and thus allowing only relatively prepared students to enter.
The second approach [the first being even more special ed] to improving graduation rates encourages academically weaker students to start at the community college level rather than at the four-year universities. This measure is particularly important now, because of the economic downturn. The cost of educating a student at a university is usually between two or three times the cost at a community college. With six-year graduation rates for students who start their college careers at the universities hovering below 60 percent, many students drop out without markedly improving their skill level. This is not only a drag on the state’s economy, but there is little benefit to the dropouts as well.Under this proposal, the social waste (which actually begins in K-12, but I can only tilt at a few windmills today) is still present, but it's less costly. There might be some gains from specialization and division of labor. The columnist correctly recognizes that professors who have research degrees and obligations to publish original research might not be the best high school teachers.
What is it about remediation and acronyms? CHEER is "Creating Higher Expectations for Educational Readiness". Northern Illinois has CHANCE, which at one time was formed from "Complete Help & Assistance Necessary to Complete Education" or something to that effect, and some functionaries here insist on turning the adjective "smart" (describing a classroom with a document camera, computer with internet access, and a whiteboard) into all caps, although I've never seen that version expanded into a slogan.
Another problem is that CHEER requires that highly-paid, university-system tenure-track Ph.D. professors teach at the high school remedial level, when community college teachers with lesser degrees are perhaps more suited for the task—and far less costly to taxpayers.
Perhaps some sort of scaled-down “boot camp” approach would make more sense if implemented at the appropriate level—the community colleges. The universities are not the place to re-teach high school subjects and to teach basic social skills. They exist to impart higher knowledge to serious students, and to create new knowledge through research.
The National Association of Scholars diagnoses program and adminstrator proliferation.
Indeed. If your preference is to work with those underserved populations, or to teach high school to twentysomethings, there might be opportunities even in this economy.
In our view public higher education across the country does face some deep financial problems. Those problems are rooted in vast overexpansion of colleges and universities in the last several decades. We in fact agree with at least one part of the AAUP’s diagnosis: “institutions have increased their relative investment in administrative positions and expenditures, and decreased their relative investment in educational positions and expenditures.” There has been a bewildering expansion of supernumerary administrative positions, including diversity officers, identity group deans, directors and staff of women’s centers, sustainability officers, residence life curriculum developers, outcomes assessors, and campus therapists of every conceivable brand. It is not clear that the AAUP realizes that it has wandered into the territory of agreeing with the NAS. But if the AAUP is serious about the problem of administrative bloat, it will need to take on all those fashionable PC annexes to the basic educational mission of the university.
We may also have some common ground with the AAUP in its worry about “a restructuring of the academic workforce from a largely full-time tenure-track faculty to one that is overwhelmingly contingent on managerial discretion and whim.” Some of what is indispensable to a genuine liberal arts education depends on having a faculty that is full-time and fully dedicated to the students in its charge. The danger, however, doesn’t come from “managerial discretion and whim.” It comes from scaling up university enrollments past the point in which it is financially feasible to sustain the curriculum on the basis of a mostly full-time tenured faculty.
A master's degree is not necessarily the right credential. A Ph.D., which is a research degree, is a serious misallocation of resources.
A terrible confession: although the majority of the math sections taught at most cc's fall into the developmental or intermediate categories, full-time faculty frequently aren't hired with an eye to that. Generally -- with noble exceptions -- you'll find higher concentrations of adjuncts at the lower end of the curriculum, even though that's where the students need the most (and best) instruction. Depending on where you are, it may be typical to require a master's degree in math to teach any level of math at all.
For the record, I consider this insane.
The short answer is that a PhD may help, but so could a lot of other things. And if a community college gig is what you really want, the reward for time and effort getting a PhD is likely to be a bad bargain. (I won't address universities, since they inhabit a different niche.)The details:
Keep in mind, however, that a Ph.D. class at Harvard has, by definition, middling and weaker students as well as stars. Getting the second- or third-best researchers into a research department poses challenges of its own. But asking research-minded faculty to take up special education is probably the worse mistake.
I'd like to say that cc students are more motivated, but the truth is more complicated. They range from highly motivated to clearly not, with all levels in between. We all enjoy working with highly motivated students; the real craft comes in working with those who aren't quite sure what's going on. The best professors I've seen at the cc level have managed to show respect for students even while challenging them, somehow convincing them that they're more capable than they think they are. That's no small feat, and the people who can do that day in and day out are rare and valuable.
Given the mission of the community college, it wouldn't make sense to get the second- or third-best research faculty. We want the best teachers. Frequently, those teachers also have fairly active research agendas, even if the forms that research takes wouldn't count for tenure at an R1. That's fine with me. If you can show that you love teaching, you keep current in your field, and you can relate to all kinds of people, you'll leapfrog untold numbers of Ph.D.'s.
Since I am a professional economist, it is my job to take all the fun out of things. So here goes.Details there.
On our present course, we are disrupting communities, dumbing down our schools, giving students false reports of their progress, and creating a private sector that will undermine public education without improving it. Most significantly, we are not producing a generation of students who are more knowledgable, and better prepared for the responsibilities of citizenship. That is why I changed my mind about the current direction of school reform.I'm on spring break and don't intend to comment at length. Go, read, understand.
Isn't the failing really in those substandard K-12 schools? To repeat: as long as institutions like Southeastern substitute self-congratulation, to borrow a Thomas Sowell expression, for substance, the U.S. News rankings will have value as ambitious students and their parents seek to avoid the institutions where academic content is inversely proportional to proclamations of access, or of diversity.
Southeastern was spending more on fund-raising than it was receiving in donations, the accreditor noted. The school’s graduation rate was a paltry 14 percent. Overall student pass rates on six exams administered through an allied health program were, respectively, 0, 0, 0, 16, 33, and 40 percent. The university had only six full-time faculty for more than thirty academic programs. Not courses—programs. One of the six was also the registrar. Middle States "found no evidence that students have knowledge, skills, and competencies consistent with institutional and appropriate higher education goals."
The letter is proof that accreditation standards do exist; despite the wide latitude institutions receive to define and evaluate their own success, it is possible to be bad enough long enough to lose accreditation. But Southeastern also illustrates just how low those standards are and how long they can be defied. Given the university’s multidecade history of loan defaults, financial struggles, and scandal, it’s fair to assume that similar letters could have been written years before.
Why, then, did Middle States wait so long to pull the plug? Surprisingly, the accreditor provided an entirely plausible answer at the end of the letter: "Ever since Southeastern University’s initial accreditation … in 1977, the Commission has recognized the University’s mission of serving diverse and underserved student populations. It is largely as a consequence of this recognition that the Commission has been so forbearing in its actions to date."
It was a masterpiece of perverse logic. Of all students, those from diverse and underserved backgrounds are most in need of a high-quality college education. They live at the margins of economic opportunity and often attend substandard K–12 schools. They are at the greatest risk of dropping out and are least likely to have social networks and college-educated parents who can help them evaluate institutional quality. Nobody needs the protection of a strong regulatory body more. And yet Middle States lowered its standards for Southeastern to near-subterranean levels precisely because the university served vulnerable students.
And Southeastern is not alone.
The gallery changes each year, although the Superintendent's favorite, not necessarily a regional or state winner, remains available for 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009 in the Cold Spring Shops collection.
Finally, the majority of Americans lack basic numeracy and knowledge of fundamental economic principles such as the workings of inflation, risk diversification, and the relationship between asset prices and interest rates. There is also a sharp disconnect between self-reported financial knowledge and financial knowledge as measured by financial literacy quizzes. Even those who give themselves high knowledge ratings score poorly on the quizzes. Moreover, while many believe they are pretty good at dealing with day-to-day financial matters, in actuality they engage in financial behaviors that generate expenses and fees: overdrawing checking accounts, making late credit card payments, or exceeding limits on credit card charges. Comparing terms of financial contracts and shopping around before making financial decisions are not at all common among the population.In Illinois, the latest unfunded mandate confronting the universities involves financial literacy. With college matriculations far exceeding college graduations, and with dropout rates rising in the high schools, a lot of students, quite possibly a lot of the students who could use this preparation most, will not get it. But we persevere.
That refers to targetable as a high-speed passenger rail line. There have been other proposals to build a low-grade, if somewhat curvier, freight line to avoid having to go over the Alleghenies or around them.
It has long been recognized that a more direct route through central
Pennsylvania is needed.
A number of proposals were offered through the years, but the most targetable was the proposed construction of the New York, Pittsburgh and Chicago Railroad in 1907. Approval was granted for construction, but the economic panic of 1907 and the start of World War I made financing the project doubtful.
The trick is providing the financing for such a project. There was an even more ambitious project, starting out of Chicago, for which the intended running time was ten hours Chicago to New York. Had such an infrastructure existed, subsequent generations of electric trains could have reduced those times to five or six hours. But the project burned through a lot of cash bridging one relatively small stream just east of Gary, Indiana.
The proposed NYP & CRR would have been a truly high-speed railroad with grades of less than two-tenths of one percent and curvature of less than two degrees. The mileage of the existing route between New York and Chicago would be reduced from 924 miles to 780.
The mileage of the existing route between New York and Pittsburgh would be reduced from 444 miles to 355 miles. This reduction was achieved by eliminating direct service to Philadelphia and by straightening the railroad through central Pennsylvania.
Even with maximum speed of only 110 mph, travel time from New York to Chicago could be reduced from the existing 19 hours to less than 12 hours, and the time between New York and Pittsburgh could be reduced from 9 hours to less than 5 hours.
Rail passenger travel would become an attractive alternative to flying because of the reduction in travel time between cities. In addition, it would be attractive for freight express shipments by providing overnight delivery between major cities.Possibly using the power cars for the same electric trains to haul container cars. Or you could modify some of the passenger trains as freight-only cars. I think that's something the interurbans did years ago.
How many stories are there of railfans, or of working railroaders, who got the railroading bug as volunteer assistant to a station agent or tower operator, handing up the orders, working the telegraph, and on at least one occasion that came to the Superintendent's attention, dispatching the trains?
Repairs to the yellow and blue highways will involve local and state taxes. Perhaps, though, hard budget constraints for state and county highway commissions will concentrate the mind.Liberalized axle load limits certainly concentrate the damage.
Those Passenger Rail projects look relatively less expensive, once pothole repairs and congestion costs figure in.
New laws allowing heavier trucks on lower-grade roads are keeping county crews busy.
They’re busy posting lower limits on most county roads in the system, restricting truck weights to the former 73,280-pound limit instead of the new 80,000-pound limit.
Why? Because 80,000 pounds is just too much, DeKalb County Highway Department Director Bill Lorence said. The difference may seem small, but Lorence said that damage becomes exponential with each additional pound.
The new weight limits that went into effect Jan. 1 eliminate the difference between designated highways – state highways and interstates – and non-designated highways, which are municipal, township, county and lower-grade state roads that didn’t meet the criteria to be designated.
The Highway Trust Fund is not the only source of road funding that's being robbed to free resources for other government projects.
Infrastructure is also a concern for Jim Linane, who has taught truck-regulation enforcement to local agencies – including some in DeKalb County – for 35 years.
Linane has proposed forming a committee of state and local road officials, government officials, law enforcement officers and trucking industry representatives to discuss issues that have arisen with the new
“Lower-weight roads were not designed to take that size of truck, that length of truck; they will cause more damage if they go unchecked,” he said.
This places the burden on the local road districts to make repairs, he said.
The Video Gaming Act? The Highway Lobby and its useful idiots in libertarian circles would have us believe that the road network is self-supporting.
The truck-regulation changes are within the Video Gaming Act and Budget Implementation Act, passed into law last July. Part of the legislation doubles the penalty for overweight violations, with the extra amount funding state capital projects.
An increase in fees is also going to the state, similar to when lawmakers enacted the 80,000-pound limit for state highways years ago to match the interstate standard. Then, local agencies weren’t affected because the changes were on state roads, Lorence said.
“Now, we’re getting the trucks but no money,” he said.
That Elburn routing involves the Union Pacific, which shares Chicago and North Western's historic allergies to passenger trains.
At a Thursday meeting of the Genoa Economic Development Committee, city administrator Joe Misurelli urged committee members to reach out to everyone they know and ask them to contact state officials to express support for the Genoa option.
A new facet to the Canadian National route is the revelation that a station would be added in South Elgin, Misurelli said, opening the rail corridor up between Rockford and western DuPage County.
“It took 30 years to get this far, so why would you not want to give it the best chance of success from the beginning?” Misurelli said. “Make it more sustainable, give it the most ridership available. Rockford and Belvidere ridership is still served with this spacing, but you add 600,000 potential riders (with the station spacing on the Genoa route.)”
State Rep. Robert Pritchard, R-Hinckley, is trying to get supporters of both routes to come together and reach a compromise, he said. IDOT has said it hopes locals can reach a consensus on the preferred route, he said.
“People feel passionate about it,” Pritchard said. “I don’t know what that compromise would look like, because they’re different routes with different benefits. But I’d like to see if we can compromise and come up with something beneficial to everyone in our area.”
Pritchard noted that a study completed by Amtrak in 2007 found the Genoa route would be the best and most direct line for the service, which is why he supports it, he said.
“This was the fastest to get up and going, had the potential to get the most riders and it’s the cheapest to do,” Pritchard said. “Those are rational concerns in this time of federal and state budget problems.”
State Sen. Brad Burzynski, R-Rochelle, however, said he has always supported the Belvidere option. He said he is looking at long-term possibilities for the region, and sees the Amtrak line as a potential precursor to commuter rail service to Rockford.
“If we’re going to be upgrading tracks, let’s do it once in one location rather than doing it twice,” Burzynski said. “It makes more sense to do that. ... If I do see commuter rail coming back to DeKalb County, I think it’s going to be through Elburn, not through Genoa.”