Extensive cross-references provided there.I'm not saying there's no risk associated with stocks and bonds. But at least you own them--you have no right to Social Security benefits, which can be changed or eliminated by future legislation. And would you invest in a corporation that admits it will lose money within five years and run out of capital just over 20 years later? Even a mediocre stock market may be better.
Simply put, Social Security is unsustainable. So, which is more prudent? Or the Ponzi Scheme? Which is the greater gamble?
22.8.10
THE STRENGTH OF THE MACROECONOMY IS THE UPPER BOUND. A public pension plan can be no stronger. Here's No Oil for Pacifists.
Labels:
economics,
hope and change,
logic
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


0 comments:
Post a Comment