So I have argued previously.

With an opportunity to engage in civil disobedience. #Comeandtakeit.

Here's Neo-Neocon with the proper clarification.
If a large enough group of refugees and/or immigrants arrives in a country without admiring the culture and customs of their new home and without wanting to become part of it except in the sense of personal financial gain, then that country is at risk of having its own culture and customs undermined. It’s not bigotry to recognize that, it’s simple logic, and although people give it the name “xenophobia” it is not a “phobia” at all. Phobias are disproportionate and irrational. A concern about what is going on in Europe (and in this country) if those conditions persist, and where it all is going to end, is (unfortunately) quite rational.
"Concern" can mean being troubled, or violently rejecting behaviours that are different, or all manner of gradations.
At the same time, the article notes that distinguishing a rational objection to a practice from an uninformed prejudice against a practice (whether it's Islam or unconventional sexuality or anything else) isn't easy.

The way to deal with a controversy, though, is to engage it, not to problematize it.
Did you know, dear reader, that German Catholics and Lutherans observed the Sabbath in ways that Yankee Congregationalists of the ante-bellum nineteenth century found deeply offensive?

No comments: