A particularly gloomy take by diplomat Charles Hill.
The era called “modern” inexorably began to come to its end when, in the second decade of the twenty-first century, a concatenation of foretold events unraveled the so-called modern world order.

As always, the foreordained collapse was generated from internal weakness. We need to look no further than Europe to understand why. It has become evident that the European Union, a contrivance designed to do away with the structural elements of that international order—the state as its basic unit and the sovereign borders of its various nations—created nothing in its place capable of coping with an economic crisis, fending off threats to its security, or absorbing history’s Great Migration.
There's plenty of push-back in the comments, although the common message strikes me that the coping will be of an emergent, and possibly messy, nature.
The collapse of the Westphalian state system meant that the foundations for the values they upheld—open trade, open expression, consent of the governed, and universal human rights—crumbled as well, and the remaining states of the core region of the world withered away.
There is no more open expression. Whether you rule something out of bounds as "haram" or as "problematic" you have trashed that value.  That takes care of the "universal human rights."  And there are ways for the governed to withdraw their consent.  Thus the messiness.

No comments: