We looked previously at the value of assimilation, plus the importance of the Western powers seeking the assistance of practicing Moslems who are not mad jihadis.  Thus Max Boot.  "To defeat those Islamic extremists, we will need the cooperation of moderate Muslim states and of the Muslims who live in the West."  That idea figures early in Strategy Page's recent Wars Update.  "In 2015 the Islamic terrorist related deaths declined in large part because Moslem nations have finally become less tolerant of the Islamic radicalism, especially when it is practiced on them instead of non-Moslems."  The article notes there are ample reasons for True Believers to attempt to convert, or eliminate, the not quite true believers.
Sunni Islam is what the majority (over 80 percent) of Moslems practice and in Arabia itself (where Islam first appeared in the 7th century) the locals believe they are more Islamic than other Moslems. After all, the Koran was written in Arabic and all the founders of Islam were Arabs. Yet for over a thousand years there has been a tradition of different factions in Arabia trying outdo each other to prove who is “more Islamic” than each other. This led to constant fighting and suppression of new ideas. One of those fanatic factions is the Wahhabi form of Sunni Islam in what is now Saudi Arabia. Wahhabis, who first appeared in the 18th century, are very conservative and very hostile to non-Moslems and Moslems who are not Sunni.

The Wahhabi problem is still most obvious in Saudi Arabia, which always practiced what it preached. Saudis comprise the largest faction of ISIL and al Qaeda recruits because so many Saudis have been educated in Wahhabi run schools. The Saudi rulers control the clergy, to a point, and do not allow public expressions of anti-Saudi Islamic radical ideas. But many Saudis back ISIL goals (which include replacing the Saudi monarchy), even is many of them do not wish to live under ISIL rule. This ideological mess is something Arab rulers, particularly in Saudi Arabia, have been dealing with since Saudi Arabia was formed in the 1920s. Change comes slowly in religious matters but meanwhile religious zealots Arab oil wealth has paid to create threaten us all.
Perhaps in the price war Iran and Saudi Arabia have gotten into there will be some respite for a troubled world. Plus fracking. Plus continued research on fusion, and improvements in batteries and capacitors.

Perhaps, though, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness can catch on, even in what appears to be inhospitable places.
This is why the Arab Spring uprisings, and their desire to establish democracies, may do some permanent damage to the Islamic terrorism tradition. There are already more condemnations of Islamic radicals by Islamic clerics and media in Moslem nations. These changes have not come as quickly as many hoped, but at least they finally arrived. This came as a surprise to many Moslems. That’s because the past has had a huge influence on Islamic societies. For many, this resistance to change is considered a religious obligation. Many Moslems consider democracy a poisonous Western invention. There is still a lot of affection for the clerical dictatorship of legend; a just and efficient government run by virtuous religious leaders. The legends are false and there are centuries of failed religious dictatorships to prove it. But this legend have become a core belief for many Moslems and tends to survive assaults by reality or the historical record.
Plato, Marx, Herbert Croly, the unnamed holy men the passage alludes to, posers all, deserving of oblivion.  (I was tempted to title this post "Allah Be Praised, I've Invented the Clerisy," except for the fact that Islam's greatest minds knew their Plato.

The article rewards careful study.  By all means, read and understand.  And consider, dear reader, the possibility that maybe we shouldn't miss the Cold War.
Most current wars are basically uprisings against inefficient, corrupt and oppressive police states or feudal societies which are seen as out-of-step with the modern world. Many are led by radicals preaching failed dogmas (Islamic conservatism, Maoism and other forms of radical socialism) that still resonate among people who don't know about the dismal track records of these creeds. Iran has replaced some of the lost Soviet terrorist support effort. That keeps Hezbollah, Hamas, and a few smaller groups going, and that's it. Terrorists in general miss the Soviets, who really knew how to treat bad boys right.
I suspect more than a few bad boys miss Saddam Hussein, all of Donald J. Trump's statements about how he brooked no terrorists notwithstanding.

No comments: