22.11.16

NATIONAL GREATNESS CONSERVATISM IS BIG GOVERNMENT.

Tim Jones of American Thinker suggests that, in attempting to play to communitarian and national security constituencies, Capital Republicans broke faith with libertarian (and perhaps anarchist) elements in the Republican coalition, and that left the way clear for Donald Trump.
It was not just the failure of the Democrats' urban-centric political focus on minorities, women, and income inequality that deep-sixed Hillary Clinton's campaign.  Walking it back, what has outraged so many grassroots conservatives was the phony conservatism under George W. Bush, culminating in the financial crisis of 2008.  It pushed them overboard to no longer get fooled by the Republican establishment that had been basically a milder form of the big-government progressivism that had taken over the Democratic Party following the loss of Hubert Humphrey in 1968 to Richard Nixon.  It was that crushing loss that sent Democrats on a far-left trajectory for decades to come.

Bush did nothing to cut back the size and growth of government.  Instead, he actually expanded it through his unfunded Medicare Part D prescription drug program and the "No Child Left Behind" federally mandated education program.  There were no efforts at all to rein in spending and the size of the federal government.  And the war with Iraq added untold billions to the ever expanding annual federal deficits.

Bush's "compassionate conservatism" was liberalism in disguise.
That squares with an hypothesis, popular among Pajamas Media writers, to the effect that the relatively polite Tea Party movement, upon being handled roughly by the Democrat-Academic-Entertainment-Media Complex, might emerge in a less refined form.

We shall see whether this movement is fulfilled or frustrated in the next two years.

No comments: