The presidential "binary choice" so many chin-pullers of the political class think we must make do with is one between an angry incoherent parody of the opening act at a cheap improv club and a screechy continuation of the failed fatal conceits of the past ninety years.

The editorial board at Richmond, Virginia's Times-Dispatch has had enough.
Neither Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton meets the fundamental moral and professional standards we have every right to expect of an American president. Fortunately, there is a reasonable — and formidable — alternative.

Gary Johnson is a former, two-term governor of New Mexico and a man who built from scratch a construction company that eventually employed more than 1,000 people before he sold it in 1999. He possesses substantial executive experience in both the private and the public sectors.
This endorsement is not one the authors entered into lightly.
ohnson’s clear and consistent support for limited government, free enterprise, social tolerance and individual freedom appeals to our own philosophical leanings. An examination of his policy positions revealed that they often match our longstanding editorial creed. (Nearby, you’ll find an analysis of how the candidates fare when judged by the standards of that creed, as well as a look at the history of editorial endorsements by The Times-Dispatch.)

But our final decision to endorse the Johnson/Weld ticket, and to do so with great confidence and enthusiasm, came only after Johnson met with the editorial board last Monday morning. We found him to be knowledgeable but unscripted, reasonable and good-humored, self-assured but free from arrogance, willing and able to address every question, consistent in his beliefs without being dogmatic, even-tempered, curious — and in all respects optimistically, realistically presidential.
The endorsement is a call for the rent-seekers in charge of the so-called presidential debates to give Mr Johnson, and, on the vice-presidential forum, former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld, a platform.

In a separate statement explaining their choice, the board rendered my judgement, in a manner more like Admiral Leahy than like Admiral King.  "Trump’s temperament is not first-class; there is no evidence of an intellect. Clinton’s ethical lapses are disabling. Johnson enjoys a decisive edge."

Nine weeks to run.

No comments: