DOES ANYTHING GOOD COME FROM RUNNING A CORPSE?

You'd expect the creatives at The Babylon Bee to crack wise:  "DNC 2024 Election Autopsy Just Joe Biden's Actual Autopsy"

Democratic strategists vowed to learn from the 2024 autopsy report and never again repeat the same errors. "Next time around, the party is not going to 'suffer repetitive blunt trauma due to falling off a bicycle'," said political operative Derek Hanover. "Things are going to be different moving forward. I promise you, the final words on the 2028 report will not be 'cerebrovascular accident', I can tell you that right now."

That's almost as funny as a serious Richard Eskow essay, "The ‘Autopsy’ Written by a Corpse."

You come to expect such things from Common Dreams, and, dear reader, you will not be disappointed.  How can a Holy Document not have all the Woke Worship Words?

I downloaded the document before reviewing my news feed, where I quickly learned that many like-minded people began exactly as I did: by searching for the word “Gaza.” Result? “Not found.” I then tried “Palestine.” Result? “Not found.” How about “Israel”? “Not found.”

And the omissions kept on coming!

Other words that can’t be found in the autopsy include “war,” “military,” “defense” (in the military sense), “peace,” “Medicare,” and “Social Security.” The report fails to address either the US’ runaway military spending or the ongoing attempts to undermine the country’s social contract.

The report’s only conceivable value will be for future anthropologists, who will find it provides considerable insight into the culture and folkways of the professional Democratic class. Its introduction reads like the kind of word salad a teenager might come up with when asked to write a 1200-word essay on a topic they forgot to study. There’s a lot of meandering, some restatements of the assignment, and a hastily looked-up quotation.

In the tussle between the corporatist and communist wings of the Democrat coalition, the communist wing clearly wants to double down on the soft-on-crime, weak-on-terrorism, education so inclusive nobody learns anything, punitive taxation policies.  At the margin, the Jarrett regency rubbing Normal noses in a Weimar freak show didn't help, but I submit that public money going to pretend hospices at tamale stands and pretend Quality Learing Centers antagonize voters who might be willing to let the crossers live and let live, as long as they're not medalling in girls' sports.

Mr Eskow doesn't think so.

The document, perhaps unsurprisingly, praises the centrist Democratic orientation of the late 1980s and 1990s. But the same pro-corporate orientation contributed heavily to the party’s 2024 losses. That’s what you get what you call on a party to emulate the centrists’ “future-focused directive”—by adopting a 40-year-old strategy.

On the other hand, G. Elliott "Strength in Numbers" Morris is of the view that the right nearly century-old strategy might be what works.  He's not a fan of so-called autopsies or of wonk-centric strategies.  On the other hand, maybe rolling the dice on even more communism might pay off for the Donks.

The only way to escape the gravity of anti-incumbent sentiment is to do something big enough that voters actually feel it, or signal that you’re trying. You don’t need a 12-point plan and to rattle off macroeconomic indicators from the Oval Office; Biden tried that. The next Democratic candidate will need something on the scale of the New Deal or the Great Society — a generational project that reorders the relationship between the American economy and the American worker, and that voters can point to and say “My life is better because of this party.”

Democrats need a president who, in 2029 — like Zohran Mamdani in New York City — says the cost of housing, healthcare, childcare, and energy is the central political question of our time, and who proposes to do something on the scale of that problem. There are lots of options on the table for a party that wants to go big. Build millions of new homes. Cap the price of insulin and expand negotiation to every essential drug. Subsidize childcare or make it a public good. Build out clean energy infrastructure fast enough to combat rising costs from AI infrastructure and climate change. Tax the people who have captured most of the economic gains over the last 20 years and use the money to fund the policies ordinary people actually buy. Pick fights with the industries that profit from scarcity and dysfunction — and win them.

With the productive people fleeing Democrat tax hells along the saltwater and freshwater coasts, and the real debt ceiling still creaking, the prospects for that sort of tax-'n-spend either persuading voters or working don't look good.