THE INTERSECTIONAL SINGULARITY.

I'm using the term in the cosmological sense of the Swarzschild radius.  It might not be as world-ending as that, let alone as the collapse of the knowledge system we called attention to yesterday.

And yet, the commanding heights of that knowledge system include the Democrat-Media-Big Education nexus of coastal cosmopolitans and the hangers-on who aspire to the occasional invitation to the wine and cheese reception.  Some years ago, we asked about such people, "Does intersectionality provide the longest road from bourgeois manners to bourgeois manners?"  Our provisional answer was "Indeed."  We concluded, "You'd think a lady writing in a conservative forum might understand that in the four thousand or years or so of human interaction we might have had a few things right before the 1960s came along."

Losing a few presidential elections to Donald Trump has Democrats beginning to catch on.

On the remote Planet Utopia, Democrat Party elders - women, feminized men, and the LGBTQIA+ lobby- ponder the question, “How did we alienate the working-class male vote?”

“I don’t know,” says one woman wearing a “The Future is Female” T-shirt.

”Our messaging is off,” says a feminized man wearing a “White Dudes for Harris” t-shirt.

”And seriously, who cares,” says a Queer influencer wearing a “We’re Here, We’re Queer, We Riot” t-shirt.

That might be, and yet losing those elections is leading to some $20 million in soul-searching.

The Democrats don’t have a man problem so much as they have a listening problem. As with Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, the crisis at the border, the transgender contagion - the Democrats have banished, shunned, and disappeared all dissent. What did they think was going to happen?

They weren't paying attention to Sasha Stone, who has a bigger platform than mine, or to me, who has staked out more or less this position for thirty years.

They didn't.

The Democrats have done nothing but push men away for at least ten years and done so loudly and openly, backed up by the legacy press and Hollywood, where masculine men have been sidelined for the girl boss or intersectionality.

Bernie Sanders drew millions of young men to his movement — the Dirtbag Left or the Bernie Bros, as we Hillary supporters called them. But even there, the Democrats were too collectively stupid to see what they had in the Bernie movement. They were punished for being misogynists, anti-feminists, and eventually, harassers and rapists.

Women were punished for supporting Bernie because he was a white male up against Hillary. I remember Gloria Steinem appeared on Bill Maher to explain why so many Democratic women were choosing Bernie Sanders over Hillary in 2016, because that was “where the boys are.”

And then, was forced to apologize.

That is why they failed.

It gives Andrew Stiles of Washington's Free Beacon something to chuckle about.

Democratic donors and consultants have been meeting in luxury hotels to analyze the party's inability to connect with male voters and propose alternative communications strategies. The results, according to the New York Times, have often resembled "anthropological studies of people from faraway places." One liberal group is planning a $20-million campaign called "Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan," or SAM for short, that will "study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality" in masculine-coded heteronormative communities.

Be sure to finish your drink before you click over.  Instead of "I could code talk to white guys watching football, fixing their truck doing that. I could put them at ease. I was the permission structure to say 'look you can do this and vote for this,'" please try anything else.