Ask, and ye shall receive.
Up to 40% of people infected with COVID-19 globally experience no symptoms early in their illness, a study published Tuesday by JAMA Network Open found.That could be both bad news and good news.
However, these asymptomatic individuals still may be susceptible to "long-haul" COVID-19 complications, such as severe chronic fatigue, and also may pass the virus to others unknowingly, the researchers said.
In the analysis of data from 95 studies that collectively included 30 million participants, 0.25% of those tested for the virus were positive but reported no symptoms, the data showed.
The findings highlight the importance of widespread, comprehensive testing, as asymptomatic infections should also be isolated and undergo contact tracing, [study co-author Min Liu, an epidemiologist in China] said.Is it not then time to start thinking that more people have gotten through this virus than Our Political Masters would like to admit, or that a positive test is not a death sentence, let alone a spur to worry about being chronically ill?
Research published in January also suggested that as many as 40% of COVID-19 cases are asymptomatic.
This may mean that case totals are underestimated, perhaps by as much as 80%, the January study indicates.
That is, think along the lines Kevin "Healthy Skeptic" Roche is thinking.
Despite extremely high vaccination rates across [basketball, football, and hockey] these sports, teams are having high numbers of players and staff test positive and be quarantined and are then testing other players and staff and quarantining them and so on. Almost all these “cases” are asymptomatic. I simply don’t have a big enough audience, because I explain repeatedly, and this is just common sense, that if you keep using PCR tests the way we have been, we are going to keep finding non-case “cases”. And that is what is happening in professional sports. The only solution is to stop any testing of asymptomatic persons. Period. And to take positive tests of symptomatic persons and retest them immediately, regularly culture a random sample of positives, and define an infectiousness threshold that only isolates persons who are actually likely to be infectious. And quarantining asymptomatic persons is similarly dumb policy, especially if the person is vaccinated. We have to stop this, and maybe because professional sports is big business, they can draw some attention to how stupid these policies are, as we watch fifth string quarterbacks play in meaningful games.Put another way, quarantining "asymptomatic persons" has a lot of quarantining of what we ought understand as "healthy persons" and absent an infectiousness threshold those fifth string quarterbacks and those kids eating their school lunches outside are a lot of casualties of bad faith. Perhaps spelling out an infectiousness threshold is something constructive that public health officials could do, rather than just chant, like a bunch of priests, maskem omnibus, injectus infinitus. National Review's Philip Klein suggests there's a "public health mafia," but doesn't this description sound more like something a clergyman, particularly an unimaginative one, might say. "When the policies that they propose do not produce the promised results, and as one variant after another surfaces, the response is to argue that we have shown insufficient respect to them and that we need to make amends by being more loyal to their guidance."
I must credit radio talker Ben Shapiro for that final argument, as it was he who reminded his listeners that bad stuff happened to Job despite Job following all of God's requests, and that it was the pagan priests who would scold the tribe for not rain-dancing enthusiastically enough or otherwise not doing enough to propitiate the gods. It was never bad advice from the elders, no, never.

