While some rail enthusiasts retain a certain affection for these unlikely survivors, for people living in the north of England, they've become a symbol of decades of underinvestment in the local transport infrastructure, and of a widening economic north-south divide in the UK.The Pacers are survivors, but they aren't as solid as, say, a Pennsylvania Railroad P70 coach, or the Pullman and Standard arks that served the South Shore Line from 1928 to 1983.
The complaints are legion. Social media is awash with tales of train roofs leaking, faulty heating and carriages filling up with noxious diesel fumes from the aging engines which power them.
Like the interurban cars, though, the Pacers kept some passenger routes open. The railbus is the same concept as the doodlebug or rail diesel car in the States.
Despite seemingly widespread dislike for Pacers, rail enthusiasts say that they have actually fulfilled a major purpose.Unfortunately, teething troubles with the new railcars (why is that not a surprise?) might mean the donkeys will continue to nod into the summer.
"Some say that by offering a cheap solution they enabled really small regional branch lines to stay open [in the 1980s] -- that if they had to have really expensive trains, they might have been under greater pressure to close," says Mark ["Man in Seat 61"] Smith.
"At the time there was a threat to rail services and it was said that the Pacers helped to prevent the closures."
"There's also a school of thought that says that some of the Pacers, now that they've been refitted with decent seats rather than bus seats, are actually not that bad and on a line with a decent track even the four-wheel frame isn't that bad," adds Smith.
For many in the north, Pacer trains are indicative of a wider trend, with the region constantly overlooked when it comes to major infrastructure investment. London, which is soon to get an £18.2 billion ($23.7 billion) Crossrail service, always seems to take precedence.

No comments:
Post a Comment