The collegiate basketball tournaments are upon us again, and this year the women's tournament is hoping to get more spectators in the arena by doubling up the second weekend's events.
In the men's tournament, the first weekend's games take place at a variety of large neutral site arenas, while the second weekend games are at four arenas, usually different from those used in the first weekend, before the semi-finals and final game use a domed football stadium.
In the women's tournament, the first weekend's games take place at the home arenas of the stronger teams. Yes, there are people who will grouse about the unfairness of having to play at South Carolina or Notre Dame or Connecticut or Tennessee, and they might have a point, although ask the Green Bay Packers how well playing at Lambeau in January has worked out in this century.
The second weekend's games will
take place in two arenas: Greenville, South Carolina; and Seattle, Washington. In place of the old compass point regionals, there are Greenville 1 and Greenville 2, and Seattle 3 and Seattle 4. What, no Greenville Teal or Seattle Lavender? Because there are at most four games in a day during the second weekend, there are no television conflicts, plus fans have the option of watching two games in a day, perhaps leading to more butts in seats. So much for amateur sports, having nothing to do with money.
That latest attempt to
extend the appeal of the game might be running afoul of another value deficiency, namely that the game isn't appealing to enough players. No, seriously. You'd think that if the pool of available players was increasing in quality and quantity that the quality of play would be better, and that established teams would find ways of remaining strong.
I dipped into the second half of Wisconsin playing Purdue at the Big Ten tournament, which featured Wisconsin giving away a seventeen point lead and eliminated from the tournament. OK, that happens, but there was a five minute stretch in the third quarter in which neither team scored, and not because of a defensive identity on both sides that one would associate with grandmasters versed in the Caro-Kann. More like turnovers and missed shots, of quantity and quality that might have
caustic critics of the game nodding. "At one time, the University of Connecticut was the preeminent women’s college basketball program. No one could beat the team except for a group of former boys high school basketball players."
But Purdue has at least one national championship in this century, and even that tradition hasn't been enough to
keep the team a regular participant in the tournament. Apparently they advanced far enough in the conference tournament to be in that "last four in, first four out" situation that the scheduling committee now finesses by making Purdue and St. John both eleven seeds and letting them play in the "First Four," so now named and so structured as to not be the stigma of those games only being played by winners of conference tournaments in weak conferences, although that is still a thing.
The Mid-American, which
five years ago qualified two teams for the national tournament, this year sent only the winner of the conference tournament. Neither Buffalo nor Central Michigan from 2018 even made the conference tournament, which of late has been limited to the top eight teams, and in the three rounds of that tournament, the higher seeded team won each game. In the regular season, Northern Illinois won its one game with conference champion Toledo, while splitting with Bowling Green and Ball State. That got them
a participation trophy chance to hoist another banner and three games for the seniors with aspirations of playing professionally to show their stuff.