Wisconsin's Talgo trains,
complete with food service cars, are ready for acceptance testing.
On a party-line vote, the legislative Joint Finance Committee
voted against allocating funds for building a maintenance base for the trains. The trains may or may not enter service, depending on on how willing either Talgo or the state is to allow itself to be held up.
Immediately after the vote, Transportation Secretary Mark Gottlieb issued a statement saying, "Today's decision to not provide funding for the permanent rail maintenance facility means that the state will be unable to put the Talgo trains into revenue service. We hope to work cooperatively with Talgo to resolve any outstanding contractual issues in a mutually satisfactory way. Existing rail service on the Hiawatha route, using Amtrak equipment, will continue without interruption."
But Talgo Vice President Nora Friend said the new trains still could enter service later this year, using the temporary maintenance base that has been set up at Talgo's north side manufacturing plant. She said that would give the state and the company until 2014 to work out a solution for a permanent base.
Wisconsin governor Scott Walker has concurred with the committee,
despite the prospect of a lawsuit.
Journal-Sentinel editors
question the decision.
There is a real benefit to upgrading Amtrak's Hiawatha service. The route is among the fastest-growing in the nation, carrying nearly 800,000 passengers last year. And the train set, built at Talgo's north side factory in the 30th St. Industrial Corridor, was providing jobs for city residents.
The legislators
defend their action, in doing so continuing one error while confirming a point we've long been making.
Those trains were meant to be built for a less than high-speed rail line between Madison and Milwaukee at great taxpayer expense. Gov. Scott Walker smartly turned away one-time federal funding for a train people didn't want and couldn't afford. The federal funding wouldn't have touched the long-term costs of maintaining and operating the train that wouldn't have saved commuters any time and would cost taxpayers in perpetuity. It was a boondoggle we couldn't afford.
If those trains were really intended to run only between Madison and Milwaukee, with through passengers changing in Milwaukee, the Wisconsin project was poorly conceived. On the other hand, if the trains were intended to run from Madison to Chicago, the project was poorly sold, and the choice of a short fixed-formation train even more dubious.
Since the trains wouldn't be used for the Madison-to-Milwaukee line, the trains had to go to Amtrak's Hiawatha line. Unfortunately, the trains are too small to meet ridership demands for that line, which means we would need to build even more cars that are more expensive to operate on the Hiawatha line. It's throwing good money after bad. For the sake of the taxpayers in Wisconsin, it was time to go back to the table and work on a deal that would better protect taxpayers.
We made the decision in the Joint Finance Committee like any family would - by looking at the numbers. In early December, the committee passed a motion to ask the Department of Transportation for a full analysis of the taxpayer cost of running the Talgo trains and opening a permanent maintenance facility for 20 years vs. the cost of running the current Amtrak trains. The difference made last week's decisions an easy one for Wisconsin taxpayers.
Meanwhile, Milwaukee to Chicago travelers will continue to make do with the beverage cart service on the existing, aging Horizon and Amfleet coaches.
Milwaukee Road photograph from the Trains Magazine collection.
At one time, passengers on the Chicago-Twin Cities line had a flexible formation train with coach, parlor, dining, and tavern service, and as that service grew, the original equipment cascaded to other services, including Madison-Milwaukee trains, some of which connected with
Hiawathas or other corridor trains in Milwaukee, and some of which ran through to Chicago.