Professor Stilgoe served the faculty of landscape architecture at Harvard at the time Metropolitan Corridor was published. He also has experience in military intelligence and an affinity for vintage O Scale modelling. The preface to Metropolitan Corridor engages in a great deal of product differentiation, concluding with "This book offers only an introduction, an addition to the vocabulary of visual analysis of the built environment." That follows a disclaimer, "The following pages look as closely as possible at the physical presence of the railroad industry and its infrastructure and seek to interpret the public attitude toward them. Dividing object from creating system may be unwise, but to research the origin, growth, and place of corporate finance in this period is to produce another book." Presumably inter alia Alfred Chandler and Ken Galbraith had that covered.
I intend to focus Book Review No. 1 on supporting the outrageous claim of the post's title. First, though, let me note that there's a lot in Metropolitan Corridor for culture-studies and assorted humanities types to learn from. My elaborations will come after the jump.
First, where do you find the metropolitan corridor? Do you look in Lionel catalogs? Do you read pulp magazines? Perhaps today's "theorists" might rediscover inductive pattern-recognition rather than arguing, on the basis of tight and empirically empty priors, that Sir Topham Hatt is a tyrant, or that there's too much sex-stereotyping in the toy department at Christmas.
Second, how do you describe the metropolitan corridor? Do you paint it "with mixed emotions"? Depict it as a smoky despoiler of all that is beautiful? Sneak a pickpocket into the Gare St-Lazare? Or show the giant conquerors of space, time, and drudgery? Most of the artistic establishment might accentuate the despoilation, although there is enough celebration of the accomplishments to fill Milwaukee's Grohmann Museum with such paintings. Do you write of it as soul-crushing, or do you affirm it? Yes, the high school American Literature curriculum is a heavy dose of Upton Sinclair and Sinclair Lewis and general "bourgeois bland sucks" and yet, concurrent with the publication of Babbitt, p. 77, came civic boosters establishing "Babbitt clubs." Les deplorables, an echo in time.


